Apple’s Automation Projects Didn’t Help Manufacturing
Over-automation can cost companies

Francis Scialabba
• less than 3 min read
Along with iTunes and the Macintosh Portable, automated production lines have been consigned to the dustbin of Apple history.
Yesterday, The Information offered an inside look at Apple’s quest for assembly line automation. In 2012, the company formed a skunkworks robotics/automation lab in Sunnyvale, CA. A year later, Apple previewed a roboticized iPad assembly belt from supplier Foxconn.
Verdict: The bots didn’t cut it for Apple, and it disbanded the lab in 2018. Robots lacked the dexterity or flexibility to assemble Apple’s meticulously designed products. In 2014, for example, automated MacBook assembly caused more problems than it solved, creating “traffic jams” and forcing humans to step in and fix the mistakes.
- Automation projects did find success in one area: quality assurance.
- The robots weren’t allowed anywhere near the iPhone, Apple’s favorite child.
The lesson: Though robots typically thrive in manufacturing environments, over-automation can cost companies. Even Tesla has struggled with over-automation in the Model 3 assembly line.
Tech news that makes sense of your fast-moving world.
Tech Brew breaks down the biggest tech news, emerging innovations, workplace tools, and cultural trends so you can understand what's new and why it matters.
By subscribing, you accept our Terms & Privacy Policy.
Tech news that makes sense of your fast-moving world.
Tech Brew breaks down the biggest tech news, emerging innovations, workplace tools, and cultural trends so you can understand what's new and why it matters.
By subscribing, you accept our Terms & Privacy Policy.